Comparison

FLUX 1.1 Pro vs Google Imagen 4

FLUX 1.1 Pro and Google Imagen 4 are the two flagship text-to-image models on ArtifyAI, and both cost 2 credits per image. Choosing between them mostly comes down to the look you want and the kind of prompt you are writing.

In short: Imagen 4 tends to lead on photorealism and natural lighting, while FLUX 1.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder with excellent prompt adherence and prompt upsampling that enriches short prompts automatically.

At a glance

FLUX 1.1 ProImagen 4
Price2 credits2 credits
SpeedMediumMedium
QualityUltraUltra
Best forOverall best, Professional creationLatest technology, Top-tier quality

Choose FLUX 1.1 Pro if…

  • You want the best all-around quality across many subjects and styles
  • You write short prompts and want the model to fill in detail (prompt upsampling)
  • You need reliable, professional commercial output
View FLUX 1.1 Pro →

Choose Imagen 4 if…

  • You want maximum photorealism and lifelike lighting
  • You are rendering people, interiors or product photography
  • Your prompt is nuanced and you want precise comprehension
View Imagen 4 →

The verdict

For photoreal scenes and people, start with Imagen 4. For everything else — concept art, stylized work, mixed subjects — FLUX 1.1 Pro is the safer default. Since both cost 2 credits, the cheapest way to decide is to run the same prompt through each and compare.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more realistic, FLUX 1.1 Pro or Imagen 4?

Imagen 4 generally produces more convincing photorealism and natural lighting, while FLUX 1.1 Pro excels at overall composition and prompt adherence across diverse styles.

Do they cost the same on ArtifyAI?

Yes, both are 2 credits per image, so you can A/B test the same prompt without a price penalty.

Which should a beginner use?

FLUX 1.1 Pro is the more forgiving all-rounder. For free practice first, use FLUX Schnell, then step up to one of these for final renders.

Try them yourself — no sign-up needed for free models.

Start generating →